Dear all,

Resending Sofia's IPR declaration to opsawg, as I don't see the initial one in OPSAWG archive
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/?q=Applying%20COSE%20Signatures%20for%20YANG%20Data%20Provenance&so=-date&sso=frm

Regards, Benoit


-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: RE: IPR Poll: draft-lopez-opsawg-yang-provenance (Applying COSE Signatures for YANG Data Provenance)
Date:   Fri, 11 Apr 2025 16:46:29 +0000
From:   Sofía García <[email protected]>
To: Benoit Claise <[email protected]>, opsawg <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, Alex Huang Feng <[email protected]>, Henk Birkholz <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, ANA MENDEZ PEREZ <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]> CC: [email protected] <[email protected]>



Dear everyone,

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.

Best regards,

Sofía García Rincón

------------------------------------------------------------------------
*De:* Benoit Claise
*Enviado:*
*Para:* opsawg; [email protected]; Alex Huang Feng; Henk Birkholz; [email protected]; ANA MENDEZ PEREZ; [email protected]
*CC:* [email protected]
*Asunto:* RE: IPR Poll: draft-lopez-opsawg-yang-provenance (Applying COSE Signatures for YANG Data Provenance)

AVISO/WARNING: Este correo electrónico se originó desde fuera de la organización. No haga clic en enlaces ni abra archivos adjuntos a menos que reconozca al remitente y sepa que el contenido es seguro / This email has been originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear draft-lopez-opsawg-yang-provenance authors (and the WG at large), In preparation of the WG call for adoption, we want to get a lay of the land in terms of IPR. Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above? Please state either: "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft” or "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)? If yes to the above, please state either: "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules” or "No, the IPR has not been disclosed" If you answer no, please provide any additional details you thinkappropriate. If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. Please send the response to the list above, and not unicast it. Regards, Joe and Benoit
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to