On Apr 24, 2025, at 5:49 AM, Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jcla...@cisco.com> wrote: > >> I see that you submitted a new revision over the weekend that addresses the >> nits around 2119 and the references. However, it raised two others. You >> reference both RFC1051 and 1201 (do you need the former if you have the >> latter?), > > We now reference neither. > > [JMC] In rev -09 the references to 1051 and 1201 are still present.
They're removed in the editor's copy at https://ietf-opsawg-wg.github.io/draft-ietf-opsawg-pcap/draft-ietf-opsawg-pcaplinktype.html. > If they are not needed (given that they are reserved and need more > specification) then they should be removed from the draft altogether. The ARCNET LinkType values are still in the editor's copy, but just say that they're reserved, without giving references, just as several other values are. "Reserved" here means "not to be assigned to anything else".
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org
