On Jun 10, 2025, at 6:01 PM, Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> Carlos Pignataro <cpign...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> 7. Shall there be a separate range for existing ones (<= 301) instead >> of lumping them in FCFS, since some have specification, etc? > > FCFS space will have uneven amount of specification, which historically we > have had. Should we designate 0-301 as "historic", meaning "this is what was registered before we established the registry, so it's inconsistent in the level of specification - we won't assign any values in that range"? _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org
