Julian Reschke via Datatracker <[email protected]> wrote:
    > 1)
    > 
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-opsawg-pcaplinktype-10.html#section-2.2.1
    > might be better as a table, or at least with some more structure between 
the
    > items. But I'll assume IANA does not care?

We tried the table way, and the format was not useful/readable.
We arrived at this format after talking with IANA.

    > 2) In
    > 
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-opsawg-pcaplinktype-10.html#section-2.2.1:

    > s/Tuexen/Tüxen/

thanks for noticing.



_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to