Dear Joe, I agreed to be listed as an author. Changing RFC 9232 to be informative makes perfectly sense since the term "Network Telemetry" is used as overall context so understand to which data the platform manifest is being used. Moreover YANG-Push notifications, RFC 8639 and RFC 8641 are normative referenced.
Best wishes Thomas From: Benoit Claise <benoit.claise=40huawei....@dmarc.ietf.org> Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2025 10:46 AM To: Diego R. Lopez <diego.r.lo...@telefonica.com>; Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jcla...@cisco.com>; draft-ietf-opsawg-collected-data-manifest <draft-ietf-opsawg-collected-data-manif...@ietf.org> Cc: opsawg <opsawg@ietf.org> Subject: RE: Shepherd procedural review of draft-ietf-opsawg-collected-data-manifest Be aware: This is an external email. Hi Joe, I also agreed to be an author. And yes informative is sufficient. Thanks, Benoit From:Diego R. Lopez <diego.r.lo...@telefonica.com<mailto:diego.r.lo...@telefonica.com>> To:Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jcla...@cisco.com<mailto:jcla...@cisco.com>>;draft-ietf-opsawg-collected-data-manifest <draft-ietf-opsawg-collected-data-manif...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-opsawg-collected-data-manif...@ietf.org>> Cc:opsawg <opsawg@ietf.org<mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>> Date:2025-06-29 10:43:29 Subject:Re: Shepherd procedural review of draft-ietf-opsawg-collected-data-manifest Hi Joe, This is to confirm I am happy to be listed as author. And, regarding your question, I believe an informative reference would suffice. Be goode, -- "Esta vez no fallaremos, Doctor Infierno" Dr Diego R. Lopez Telefonica https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr2lopez/ e-mail: diego.r.lo...@telefonica.com<mailto:diego.r.lo...@telefonica.com> Mobile: +34 682 051 091 --------------------------------- On 29/6/25, 10:18, <jcla...@cisco.com<mailto:jcla...@cisco.com>> wrote: To each of the authors on this draft, please acknowledge you wish to be listed as authors. I'd say the same for contributors, but you have an empty Contributors section. You seem to have an unused reference to I-D.havel-nmop-digital-map, and there is a downref to RFC9232, which is not already in the downref registry. I'm not sure the best fix for this. Would one need to understand the whole Network Telemetry Framework to make use of the Data Collection Manifest? Or should this just be an informative reference on the term? Joe ________________________________ Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción. The information contained in this transmission is confidential and privileged information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete it. Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinatário, pode conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa senhoria o destinatário indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utilização, divulgação e/ou cópia sem autorização pode estar proibida em virtude da legislação vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destruição
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org
