Michael Tuexen <[email protected]> wrote: >> Thanks for the IPR confirmation. I’m all for giving credit to where >> it’s due, but would be sufficient to link to this CREDITS page? I’m >> all for a non-ng name. What is “ecap”?
> Why? People are used to the pcap-ng acronym. I do agree, that "pcap
> next generation" is not a good name. But what about "pcap now
> generic"? So keep the acronym, but choose a better name with the
> deployed acronym?
Michael and I talked about this today at the hackathon.
I'm all for it, if the WG consents.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =- *I*LIKE*TRAINS*
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
