> On 27. Aug 2025, at 22:26, Joe Clarke (jclarke) 
> <jclarke=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> I’m way behind on this.  Summer and some other things got the better of me.
>  The WG LC has concluded.  The feedback was to clarify some text in the 
> draft, especially around this being historical, as well as how the forward 
> reference to pcapng should appear.  And again, Michael Tüxen has agreed to 
> shepherd.  We are awaiting this new draft revision and the shepherd write-up, 
> and then we will move forward to the IESG.
Hi Joe,

I will do the shepherd write-up once the ID has been revised.

Best regards
Michael
>  There was some additional discussion that PCAPng should remain PCAPng and 
> there be a “backronym” that “ng” will mean “now generic”.  That is for the 
> remaining PCAPng draft.
>  Joe
>  From: Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jclarke=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org>
> Date: Sunday, July 20, 2025 at 04:42
> To: opsawg <opsawg@ietf.org>
> Subject: [OPSAWG]WG LAST CALL: PCAP Capture File Format 
> (draft-ietf-opsawg-pcap)
> With the IPR call concluded (no IPR has been disclosed), we are going to run 
> a three-week last call on this historical draft.  Michael Tüxen has 
> graciously agreed to act as shepherd.  Given that this is the IETF week, 
> we’ll do a three week WG LC for 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-pcap/.
>  Please post comments and thoughts on the document’s readiness to the list.
>  The WG LC will conclude on August 11, 2025.
>  Joe and Benoît
> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org


_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to