Dear Greg,

>> IOAM can be applied to synthetic test packets. While the IOAM is 
>> “in-packet”, the packets that it is in are not data packets, so the 
>> methodology is purely Active OAM : it uses dedicated OAM packets.
> GIM>> Yes, and that is what, in my opinion, mixes the characterization of OAM 
> protocols according to RFC 7799 with how an OAM protocol can be applied. The 
> fact that IOAM or the Alternate Marking method is used in combination with a 
> data or synthetic packet doesn't change the characterization of the protocol. 

It actually does. 
Characterization: The act of describing the qualities, traits, or distinctive 
features.
Just trying to understand what the objective of your reply is.


> On Sep 3, 2025, at 3:18 PM, Greg Mirsky <gregimir...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Alternate marking can be applied to data packets, making it Hybrid OAM. But 
>> I don’t read draft-fioccola to be talking about this mode.
> GIM>> I support the adoption of the draft as it provides a solid foundation 
> for continued work. I intend to work and contribute to it, including adding 
> the Alternate Marking method. 
>> 
>> 


Still trying to understand your goal.
You might want to reply about adoption on the other thread about 
draft-fioccola-ippm-on-path...?
Note, it might be more useful to adapt new drafts to this characterization, 
than to try to change the characterization for every new draft.

Best,

Carlos.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to