Dear Thomas, Thanks for reviewing the document.
We believe that your comments have been addressed in the current version: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-characterization/11/ Please let us know if there are further comments. Thanks, The authors. On Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 10:49 AM <thomas.g...@swisscom.com> wrote: > > Dear Tal, Carlos and Adrian, > > > > As an individual, I have reviewed the latest revision of the document. > > > > DOCX: > https://github.com/network-analytics/ietf-network-analytics-document-status/blob/main/document-review/draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-characterization-09.docx > > PDF: > https://github.com/network-analytics/ietf-network-analytics-document-status/blob/main/document-review/draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-characterization-09.pdf > > > > Thanks again that you are working on this. This work is much appreciated. As > an author, it makes it much more easier when well defined terms can be > reused. It fosters a common understanding. I like that the document uses > multiple criteria's to describe the application. Section 3.4 describes that > well. > > > > My comments are editorial. Some of them suggest describing also the reasoning. > > > > Best wishes > > Thomas > > _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org
