Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <[email protected]> wrote:
> ** Section 3.2
> * Values from 0 to 65000 are allocated following a First-Come First-
> Served policy (Section 4.4 of [RFC8126]). Values in the ranges
> 0-10, 50-51, and 98-301 are already assigned; values in the ranges
> 11-49 and 52-97 MUST NOT be assigned.
> -- Why are 11-49 and 52-97 not just reserved?
The text has been updated slightly.
They are not assignable because they may have been used by OSes awhile ago.
> -- Per
>
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/statement-iesg-statement-on-clarifying-the-use-of-bcp-14-key-words/,
> please remove the BCP14 key words from the IANA Considerations section.
changed in -13.
> ** Section 3.2.2. What is the purpose of this section? The two
registration
> policies for this registry are FCFS and experimental, neither of which
have a
> designated expert.
Yes, it's because the registration policy was split before.
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | IoT architect [
] [email protected] http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
