Deb Cooley has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsawg-pcaplinktype-13: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-pcaplinktype/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The datatracker and the shepherd says 'Informational', but the draft says 'Standards Track', please update. Many of the references are not stable - anything pointing to a website, for example. Section 3.2.2, para 1: These two sentences are contradictory - 'provide a specification' and 'no requirement for a specification'. I support Ketan's and Roman's discusses. _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
