Joe posted a formal call at:
    https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/gmLguHReq94gnICl-NiNuVRgRZs/

Giving Nov.14 as the closing date for objections.
Chairs: will you consider the lack of comment = lack of objection?

[JMC] As it stands now, both you and I (no hats) agree, but I am expecting two 
more comments on-list by tomorrow.

Joe

https://github.com/IETF-OPSAWG-WG/draft-ietf-opsawg-pcap/pull/192

What I see as my todo:

Change:
   *  Values from 0 to 65000 are allocated following a First-Come First-
      Served policy (Section 4.4 of [RFC8126]).  Values in the ranges
      0-10, 50-51, and 98-301 are already assigned; values in the ranges
      11-49 and 52-97 are reserved and must not be assigned.

to:
   *  Values from 0 to 65000 are allocated following an Expert Review
      policy (Section 4.5 of [RFC8126]).  Values in the ranges
      0-10, 50-51, and 98-301 are already assigned; values in the ranges
      11-49 and 52-97 are reserved and must not be assigned.

and to put the Advice for Designated Experts back in:

3.2.2.  Guidance for Designated Experts

   When processing a request for an allocation, the Designated Experts
   will encourage the requester to provide a specification at a stable
   URL.  There is no requirement for a specification, but often review
   of the specification allows the Designated Expert to determine if the
   allocation actually is a duplicate of another specification.

   When the contents of the link type can contain an IPv4 or IPv6
   header, then the octets between the beginning of the link type and
   the IP header needs to be clear.

   Specifications that are not publicly available, but which may be
   obtained via liaison agreements (such as to ITU-T, 3GPP, IEEE, etc.)
   are acceptable particularly if the specification document will be
   public eventually, but are discouraged.  For other documents, the
   Designated Expert will need use their judgement, or consult the
   OPSAWG or an Area Director.

   LinkTypes for which specifications are not publicly available may
   have values allocated within the FCFS range.  This includes
   specifications that might be subject to a security classification.
   The minimal requirement is to provide a contact person for that link
   type.



--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide




_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to