Mahesh Jethanandani <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Michael, >> Okay. I wish you'd said this earlier :-) >> please see: https://github.com/IETF-OPSAWG-WG/draft-ietf-opsawg-pcap/pull/195/files >> I can post -17 if this satisfies you.
> I did take a quick look at the diffs. Thank you for sharing.
> What did we decide for grandfathered entries that do not have a
> reference? Did we not decide to refer to the document itself? E.g.,
> LinkType Value 4, 5, etc.
I don't understand the question.
They have a name, they have no description/reference at this point, so their
change controller is [email protected]. If someone wants IANA to change
something then IANA will ask that mailbox for instructions.
>>> The initial version of the table in Section 2.2.1 shows:
>>
>>> - Name
>>> - Number
>>> - Description
>>> - Reference
>>
>> okay, I've renamed the initgial version file "stanzas"
>> (note it's presented this way because a table did not fit, and IANA
suggested thisA)
>> We changed the order of the table from Name/Value -> Value/Name.
>> I have not changed the order in initial value stanzas, as there are many
of them, and
>> we've departed from the .csv file and scripts at this point...
> Is the order now Value/Name? Hmm. Maybe then I do not understand how
> the linktypes.xml file is rendered, and the order is what you say it
> is. I can wait for you to publish the version.
The table order is now:
B A C D E
the initial file is presented in order:
A:
B:
C:
D:
E;
I could reorder the **markdown** which was produced from a csv file, but
since it has been edited since, I am not doing that.
>> 2. If we got a request from, say, the NSA, we would say yes. We might
not
>> be able to list more than "NSA, Fort Mead, Drone to Aircraft Division"
>> (To make something up. Likely, it would be some contractor asking...)
>>
>> 3. Like, phone numbers are not yet obsolete :-)
> How about “contact information for a person, which should include the
> name as the minimum, and any additional information such as email
> address, phone number.”?
How about we let the designated experts exercise judgement? Otherwise, why
have them at all? If they do it badly, then the IESG can replace them.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
