Hi, Joe: 发件人: Joe Clarke (jclarke) [mailto:[email protected]] 发送时间: 2026年3月20日 9:38 收件人: Qin Wu <[email protected]>; [email protected] 抄送: Victor Lopez (Nokia) <[email protected]> 主题: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-scheduling-oam-tests-05.txt
>>Thanks for the summary, Qin! I've had a chance to review -05, and I >>appreciate you addressing the error specificity issue. >>However, with respect to "twamp", I'm still not clear why this test is >>specifically called out as an identity. Why not leave it up to all other >>modules to add their own types? At the very least, can you >>explain in the document why this one identity is defined? [Qin Wu] : I tend to agree with we should leave derived identity to extension model. Otherwise, we should provide a list of derived identities as a good basis. See the PR I have submitted https://github.com/vlopezalvarez/draft-contreras-opsawg-scheduling-oam-tests/pull/79 >>The numexecutions leaf is odd to me. First, I think something like >>"execution-count" might read better. But, more importantly, how does this >>factor into recurrence/frequency? If I choose 3 executions, >>are they executed simultaneously? One after the other? On the frequency >>intervals? [Qin Wu] In the current version, we import “recurrence-basics” grouping from RFC9922, in such grouping, only frequency and interval parameters are specified, however it doesn’t restrict the number of times the same test sequence is executed, therefore we believe numexecutions leaf can be used to limit the number of times the same test sequence is executed. See the PR I have submitted: https://github.com/vlopezalvarez/draft-contreras-opsawg-scheduling-oam-tests/pull/80/changes Alternatively, we can import “recurrence-utc” grouping, which has “count” parameter used to restrict the number of times the same test sequence is executed. >>With respect to results, I get that the output would be found in the >>respective device model. But how would I correlate the results found there >>with a specific scheduled test? In the twamp example, it >>looks as though the mounted structure in ne-config would have these results, >>but the ping template example made this less clear. [Qin Wu] I have Updated ping template example in the appendix to indicate results relation, see PR I submitted: https://github.com/vlopezalvarez/draft-contreras-opsawg-scheduling-oam-tests/pull/81/changes >>I think you should add some text as to why the test-ref list is ordered-by >>user. Does that influence the order in which tests are run? An implementor >>may want some normative text that states tests >>MUST be run in the set order. [Qin Wu] I have added some clarification text to justify why Ordered-by user is required https://github.com/vlopezalvarez/draft-contreras-opsawg-scheduling-oam-tests/pull/83/changes >>Your security considerations references RFC5246. Should that instead be a >>reference to 8446 (TLS 1.3)? [Qin Wu] Fixed in https://github.com/vlopezalvarez/draft-contreras-opsawg-scheduling-oam-tests/pull/82/changes >>Joe ________________________________ From: Qin Wu <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2026 1:56 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: Victor Lopez (Nokia) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: [OPSAWG]Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-scheduling-oam-tests-05.txt Hi, Folks: v-05 has been posted, the main changes in v-05 and v-04 include: • Error Cause Indication Support • Clarify sequencing semantics • Pre-execution admission control • Add choice-case statement support for schedule types • Trigger for state transition (#48) • Performance impact analysis in the new operational consideration (#49) See diff: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=draft-ietf-opsawg-scheduling-oam-tests-03&url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-scheduling-oam-tests-05&difftype=--html -Qin (on behalf of coauthors) -----邮件原件----- 发件人: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> 发送时间: 2026年3月18日 8:12 收件人: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 抄送: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 主题: I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-scheduling-oam-tests-05.txt Internet-Draft draft-ietf-opsawg-scheduling-oam-tests-05.txt is now available. It is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group (OPSAWG) WG of the IETF. Title: A YANG Data Model for Network Diagnosis using Scheduled Sequences of OAM Tests Authors: Luis M. Contreras Victor Lopez Qin Wu Name: draft-ietf-opsawg-scheduling-oam-tests-05.txt Pages: 31 Dates: 2026-03-17 Abstract: This document defines a YANG data model to support on-demand network diagnosis using Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) tests. This document defines both 'oam-unitary-test' and 'oam-test- sequence' YANG modules to manage the lifecycle of network diagnosis procedures, intended for use by external management and orchestration systems (including SDN controllers and network orchestrators), rather than by individual network nodes. The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-scheduling-oam-tests/ There is also an HTMLized version available at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-opsawg-scheduling-oam-tests-05 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-scheduling-oam-tests-05 Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at: rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts _______________________________________________ I-D-Announce mailing list -- [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
