On 10/07/2012 04:11 AM, Dobbins, Roland wrote: >> 2) It should probably reference >> draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain, since it means that you can >> safely drop first-fragments that fail to include the entire IPv6 >> header chain. > > We don't necessarily know what a 'first-fragment' is in a given > communications session, given unpredictability in order of arrival. > 'Initial fragment' would probably be a better choice (vs. non-initial > fragment).
English as second language here, so the difference is not that big for me. Anyway, I was referring to packets containing a Fragment Header with the FO=0. Cheers, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: [email protected] PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 _______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
