WG chairs, We just submitted a new version of the link-local draft, with a number of small edits, and now also a section on IXPs (follow-up from the interim meeting in Amsterdam). If there is still a slot available in Atlanta, we'd like to briefly present and discuss the changes.
Thanks, Eric and Michael > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of [email protected] > Sent: 22 October 2012 21:04 > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: [OPSEC] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only-02.txt > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > This draft is a work item of the Operational Security Capabilities for IP > Network Infrastructure Working Group of the IETF. > > Title : Using Only Link-Local Addressing Inside an IPv6 > Network > Author(s) : Michael Behringer > Eric Vyncke > Filename : draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only-02.txt > Pages : 9 > Date : 2012-10-22 > > Abstract: > In an IPv6 network it is possible to use only link-local addresses on > infrastructure links between routers. This document discusses the > advantages and disadvantages of this approach to help the decision > process for a given network. > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only > > There's also a htmlized version available at: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only-02 > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only-02 > > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > _______________________________________________ > OPSEC mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec _______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
