Dear all,
I have read draft-gont-opsec-dhcpv6-shield-01 and believe the DHCP signaling 
issue pointed here is significant. The draft provides a simple but applicable 
strategy to filter DHCP msg from vicious servers, thereby protect the host. 
With the manual configuration and layer-2 deployment, the method is easy-to-use 
and the draft has the guiding significance for DHCPv6 deployment scenario. 
I support the adoption of this document as WG document.

Thank you,
Tina

On Dec 1, 2012, at 1:05 PM, "Arturo Servin" <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
>    I have read and support.
> 
> Regards,
> as
> 
> On 27/11/2012 10:34, Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve) wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> During IETF85 meeting this draft was found useful as WG document by the
>> OPSEC WG.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> This is a call for WG adoption of this work. Please voice your comments
>> in OPSEC WG email alias.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Latest document:
>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gont-opsec-dhcpv6-shield/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Kind Regards,
>> 
>> OPSEC chairs
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> OPSEC mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> OPSEC mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
_______________________________________________
OPSEC mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec

Reply via email to