Folks,
One picky point of grammar.....
In section 4.6.5 you say, "Routers, security gateways, and firewalls SHOULD
drop IP packets containing a Stream Identifier option." However, in Section
4.1.5 you say, "Routers, security gateways, and firewalls SHOULD NOT drop
packets containing this [the end of options list] option."
So, how should a device behave when it receives a packet containing both?
Clearly, you want to drop the packet, but that document doesn't say that.
Ron
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
> Of Warren Kumari
> Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 1:46 PM
> To: [email protected]; draft-ietf-opsec-ip-options-
> [email protected]
> Cc: Warren Kumari
> Subject: [OPSEC] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-ip-options-
> filtering
>
> Dear OpSec WG,
>
> This starts a Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-opsec-ip-options-
> filtering.
>
> The draft is available here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-
> ietf-opsec-ip-options-filtering/
>
> Please review this draft to see if you think it is ready for
> publication.
>
> Send comments to the list, clearly stating your view.
>
> This WGLC ends Mon 04-Mar-2013.
>
> Thanks,
> Warren Kumari
> (as OpSec WG co-chair)
>
>
> --
> "Real children don't go hoppity-skip unless they are on drugs."
>
> -- Susan, the ultimate sensible governess (Terry Pratchett,
> Hogfather)
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OPSEC mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
_______________________________________________
OPSEC mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
