Hi Fernando,
On 10/04/2013 06:17, Fernando Gont wrote:
> Hi, Brian,
>
> My apologies for the delay in my response. Please find my comments
> in-line...
>
>
> On 04/02/2013 06:45 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>> Fernando,
>>
>> Rather than repeating myself, I'll suggest a change to the Introduction
>> that would (IMHO) improve the message:
>>
>> OLD:
>>
>> 1. Introduction
>>
>> Most general-purpose operating systems implement and enable native
>> IPv6 [RFC2460] support and a number of transition/co-existence
>> technologies by default. For cases in which the corresponding
>> devices are deployed on networks that are assumed to be IPv4-only,
>>
>> NEW:
>>
>> 1. Introduction
>>
>> Most general-purpose operating systems implement and enable native
>> IPv6 [RFC2460] support and a number of transition/co-existence
>> technologies by default [RFC6434]. Support of IPv6 by all nodes is
>> intended to become best current practice [RFC6540]. As a result,
>> networks will need to plan for and deploy IPv6 and its security
>> mechanisms. Some enterprise networks might, however, choose to delay
>> active use of IPv6. For networks that are assumed to be IPv4-only,
>
> I've checked with a few folks, and it seems that the suggested text
> would make everyone happy, except for the sentence that says "As a
> result, networks will need to plan for and deploy IPv6 and its security
> mechanisms.", on the basis that this is not the document to make a case
> for v6 deployment. The suggestions has been to remove that sentence, and
> apply the rest of your proposed text (or, alternatively, to tone down
> that sentence).
>
> For simplicity sake (and because I'm not sure how one would tone that
> one down), my suggestion would be to apply you proposed text, modulo
> that sentence.
>
> Would that be okay with you? -- If not, please do let me know, so that
> we can try to find a way forward that keeps everyone happy.
Well, it's not for me to call the consenus, but with that sentence
removed I would personally enter the "no objection" state.
Thanks
Brian
_______________________________________________
OPSEC mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
