KK, chairs, Joel,

The revised charter looks good to me.

One small comment, the following sentence seems to be a bit of a runaway long 
one:
"In particular, efforts will be made to clarify the rationale supporting 
current operational practice, address gaps in currently understood best 
practices for forwarding, control plane, and management plane security and 
clarify liabilities inherent in security practices where they exist."

(Plus there's a preposition missing after "rationale") I wonder if it could be 
fragmented or turned into a list. For example:
"The working group documents security practices in the forwarding, control, and 
management planes. In particular, efforts will be made to clarify the rationale 
of supporting current operational practice, addressing gaps in currently 
understood best practices, and clarifying liabilities inherent in security 
practices where they exist."

Thanks,

Thumb typed by Carlos Pignataro.
Excuze typofraphicak errows

On Jun 30, 2013, at 1:11 PM, "KK" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> 
wrote:

Hey Folks,

Just a reminder, we'll be wrapping this up today.

Thanks,
KK


On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 10:59 AM, KK <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> 
wrote:
Dear All,

The chairs in conjunction with our AD, Joel, recently worked on a draft 
revision to our charter text. The changes in this revision are mostly related 
to elaborating on the type of documents this WG produces along with some minor 
wordsmithing here and there.

We would like to get you to review the text and provide comments. Please have a 
read and voice an opinion one way or the other. If we don't hear any objections 
by June 30th, we'll assume you love it and proceed.

Thanks,
KK, Gunter, Warren

P.S. The current version of the charter can be found at 
http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/opsec/charter/


**********

Proposed Revised OPSEC Charter:

"""


Goals:


The OPSEC WG will document operational issues and best current practices with 
regard to network security. In particular, efforts will be made to clarify the 
rationale supporting current operational practice, address gaps in currently 
understood best practices for forwarding, control plane, and management plane 
security and clarify liabilities inherent in security practices where they 
exist.


Scope:


The scope of the OPSEC WG is intended to include the protection and secure 
operation of the forwarding, control and management planes. Documentation of 
operational issues, revision of existing operational

security practices documents and proposals for new approaches to operational 
challenges related to network security are in scope.


Method:


It is expected that the product of the working group will result in the 
publication of informational or BCP RFCs. Taxonomy or problem statement 
documents may provide a basis for such documents.


Informational or Best Current Practices Document


For each topic addressed, a document that attempts to capture common practices 
related to secure network operation will be produced. This will be primarily 
based on operational experience. A document might convey:


* a threat or threats to be addressed

* current practices for addressing the threat

* protocols, tools and technologies extant at the time of writing that are used 
to address the threat

* the possibility that a solution does not exist within existing tools or 
technologies


Taxonomy and Problem Statement Documents


A document which attempts to describe the scope of particular operational 
security challenge or problem space without necessarily coming to a conclusion 
or proposing a solution. Such a document might

be a precursor to an informational or best current practices document.


While the principal input of the working group is operational experience and 
needs, the output should be directed towards providing guidance to the 
operators community, other working groups that develop

protocols or the community of protocol developers at large and implementers of 
these protocols.


Non-Goals:


The OPSEC WG is not the place to do new protocols. New protocol work should be 
addressed in a working group chartered in the appropriate area or as individual 
submissions. The OPSEC WG may take on documents related to the practices of 
using such work.


"""

_______________________________________________
OPSEC mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
_______________________________________________
OPSEC mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec

Reply via email to