On Sep 11, 2013, at 10:54 AM, Fernando Gont <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 09/11/2013 11:18 AM, Warren Kumari wrote: >> The authors of draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-nd-security-01 have asked for it >> to be adopted as a OpSec document -- we would like to check whether >> any claims of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) on the document have >> not yet been disclosed. >> >> Are you personally aware of any IPR that applies to >> draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-nd-security-01? If so, has this IPR been >> disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules? (See RFCs 3979, 4879, >> 3669, and 5378 for more details.) > > I know of no IPR claims on the aforementioned document (and would be > disappointed if there were any, I should say :-) ). Fair 'nuff. I assumed that, but it doesn't hurt to ask (especially because I have a script to do so :-)) -- having this info available allows the WG to make a decision if they want to adopt or not[0]. It also makes it harder for folk to later claim that they didn't know about the IPR requirements. W [0]: Many folk (myself included) would prefer not to adopt an IPR encumbered draft if at all possible. > > Thanks, > -- > Fernando Gont > SI6 Networks > e-mail: [email protected] > PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 > > > > > _______________________________________________ > OPSEC mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec > -- My memory is failing, so I changed my password to "incorrect". That way, when I login with the wrong password the computer tells me… "Your password is incorrect". _______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
