I've reviewed draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only-04. I've sent my detailed suggested revisions and comments directly to the authors, but at a high level:
1) The introduction makes reference to RFC6860 regarding OSPFv2 and OSPFv3, but then doesn't mention this in the rest of the document. Why is this in the introduction? Why is this not mentioned in the rest of the document? 2) I'm not sure if it is common knowledge what is intended by phrase, "greater than link-local-scope", or at least I wasn't familiar with it. Minimally, can the document include a reference to how "greater" or "less than" is used in terms of address types? 3) At the end of the document, you make reference to "the traditional approach". I don't think you've clarified what you mean by "the traditional approach", although I can guess what you've meant. Bill Cerveny _______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
