On Dec 2, 2013, at 8:53 AM, Michael Behringer (mbehring) <[email protected]> wrote:
> OPsec WG, > > Eric and I worked through the reviews we got on the WGLC (see Eric's emails > last week). > > Version 04 includes WGLC reviews from: > - Wes George > - Fernando Gont > - Rama Darbha > > Version 05 includes now the reviews from: > - Bill Cerveny > - Jen Linkova > > Version 5 is now posted. > Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only-05 > Diff: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only-05 > > Chairs, could you please indicate whether you would like to see more reviews, At the meeting Fernando, Ron, Jen, Andrew Y. and Bill Cerveny agreed to review. Fernando, Jen and Bill have submitted reviews -- Ron and Andrew, can you please get yours in? > or whether we're good to advance this draft? We should be meeting / chatting tomorrow morning and will discuss this. W > > Thanks, > Eric and Michael > > _______________________________________________ > OPSEC mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec > -- "Does Emacs have the Buddha nature? Why not? It has bloody well everything else..." _______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
