Well put!


> On Dec 4, 2013, at 4:06 AM, Gert Doering <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
>> On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 08:59:27AM +0000, Michael Behringer (mbehring) wrote:
>> So the agreement at the time was to list, factually, without any weighing of 
>> judgement, the technical aspects, pros and cons. This is what we're trying 
>> to do. 
> 
> ... and this I support :-) - even if I'm in the "I don't like this approach"
> camp.
> 
>> So I suggest we keep the document factual, and let operators make their own 
>> choices. This is what the document should achieve. It should not make a 
>> judgement on the value of any aspects, because those would be 
>> context-dependent. 
> 
> +1
> 
> Gert Doering
>        -- NetMaster
> -- 
> have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
> 
> SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
> Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
> D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
> Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
> _______________________________________________
> OPSEC mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
_______________________________________________
OPSEC mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec

Reply via email to