The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6192,
"Protecting the Router Control Plane".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6192&eid=3906

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Nick Hilliard <[email protected]>

Section: A.1

Original Text
-------------
[...]
   ip access-list extended DNS
    permit udp 198.51.100.0 0.0.0.252 eq domain any
   ipv6 access-list DNSv6
    permit udp 2001:DB8:100:1::/64 eq domain any
    permit tcp 2001:DB8:100:1::/64 eq domain any
   ip access-list extended NTP
    permit udp 198.51.100.4 255.255.255.252 any eq ntp
   ipv6 access-list NTPv6
    permit udp 2001:DB8:100:2::/64 any eq ntp
   ip access-list extended SSH
    permit tcp 198.51.100.128 0.0.0.128 any eq 22
   ipv6 access-list SSHv6
    permit tcp 2001:DB8:100:3::/64 any eq 22
   ip access-list extended SNMP
    permit udp 198.51.100.128 0.0.0.128 any eq snmp
[...]


Corrected Text
--------------
[...]
   ip access-list extended DNS
    permit udp 198.51.100.0 0.0.0.3 eq domain any
   ipv6 access-list DNSv6
    permit udp 2001:DB8:100:1::/64 eq domain any
    permit tcp 2001:DB8:100:1::/64 eq domain any
   ip access-list extended NTP
    permit udp 198.51.100.4 0.0.0.3 any eq ntp
   ipv6 access-list NTPv6
    permit udp 2001:DB8:100:2::/64 any eq ntp
   ip access-list extended SSH
    permit tcp 198.51.100.128 0.0.0.127 any eq 22
   ipv6 access-list SSHv6
    permit tcp 2001:DB8:100:3::/64 any eq 22
   ip access-list extended SNMP
    permit udp 198.51.100.128 0.0.0.127 any eq snmp
[...]

Notes
-----
The bitfield masks in the Cisco Configuration example  in section A.1 look 
incorrect.  The authors may have intended the following meanings:

ip access-list extended DNS
  all hosts between 198.51.100.0 and 198.51.100.3 instead of all addresses in 
the range 198.51.100.0/24 which are evenly divisible by 4

ip access-list extended NTP
  all hosts between 198.51.100.4 and 198.51.100.7 instead of all addresses in 
the range 0.0.0.0/0 which are evenly divisible by 4

ip access-list extended SSH
  all hosts between 198.51.100.128 and 198.51.100.255 instead of 
198.51.100.128/32

ip access-list extended SNMP
  all hosts between 198.51.100.128 and 198.51.100.255 instead of 
198.51.100.128/32

Instructions:
-------------
This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC6192 (draft-ietf-opsec-protect-control-plane-06)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Protecting the Router Control Plane
Publication Date    : March 2011
Author(s)           : D. Dugal, C. Pignataro, R. Dunn
Category            : INFORMATIONAL
Source              : Operational Security Capabilities for IP Network 
Infrastructure
Area                : Operations and Management
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG

_______________________________________________
OPSEC mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec

Reply via email to