On 3/23/14, 10:39 AM, Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) wrote:
> Joel, Warren (as shepherd),
> 
> In addition to some responses below, it appears that my review
> comments sent to opsec are yet to be addressed: 
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsec/current/msg01477.html "The
> only remaining bit is the issue raised by Carlos which we'll 
> hopefully address in the next rev." 
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsec/current/msg01447.html
> 
> It seems the remaining bit is still remaining. Frankly, I am still
> concerned that this doc still refers to "VPN Leakages" while its
> applicability and scope is a small subset of "VPNs".

the problem I take it with respect to aplicability is that the draft
targets a narrow subset of vpns. The problem of exposure via split
tunnels  or in fact multi-interface issues is covers a whole range of
issues, some of which are deliberate, some accidental or in this case
inadvertent.

> More inline.
> 
> On Mar 23, 2014, at 10:57 AM, joel jaeggli <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I hope that you folks are recovering well from IETF meeting
>> related excesses and accompanying travel.
>> 
>> Some questions came up in the IESG review of the document that are
>> more appropriately answered by the working group rather than by me
>> attempting to channel you folks.
>> 
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsec-vpn-leakages/
>> 
>> 1. Does the working-group view view disabling IPV6 in deployed
>> equipment due to operational necessity as a desirable outcome.
> 
> My personal view is "No". That would be a step backwards in deploying
> IPv6.
>> 
>> 2. Does the working-group characterize the problem of vpn leakages 
>> captured in this document as being distinct from the problems posed
>> by split-tunnels in general.
>> 
> 
> I do not think it is different. Rather, this is one instantiation of
> a more general problem.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -- Carlos.
> 
>> Your thoughts would be appreciated. joel
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list 
>> [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
> 


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
OPSEC mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec

Reply via email to