Hi authors,

I recently read your draft
draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-firewall-reqs-00<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-firewall-reqs-00>
.
I think it is quite useful for operators and it is in a good shape. Thanks
for your effort.

Just a quick question: I think NAT is a quite common function in firewall,
is there some reason that it should not be included in IPv6 firewall ?

Best wishes

-- 
==============================================
Qiong Sun
China Telecom Beijing Research Institute


Open source code:
lightweight 4over6: *http://sourceforge.net/projects/laft6/
<http://sourceforge.net/projects/laft6/>*
PCP-natcoord:* http://sourceforge.net/projects/pcpportsetdemo/
<http://sourceforge.net/projects/pcpportsetdemo/> *
===============================================
_______________________________________________
OPSEC mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec

Reply via email to