Hi, Qiong, On 03/30/2014 11:30 PM, Qiong wrote: > > I recently read your draft draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-firewall-reqs-00 > <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-firewall-reqs-00> . I > think it is quite useful for operators and it is in a good shape. Thanks > for your effort. > > Just a quick question: I think NAT is a quite common function in > firewall, is there some reason that it should not be included in IPv6 > firewall ?
I'd say that, s far, it has not been included mostly because we have not yet worked out all requirements and details. That said, I'd bet you'd find a lot of opposition for such a requirement here at the IETF. Given that you've already raised the question, I'll essentially read the wg comments, and reflect the discussion in the next revision of the I-D. Thanks so much! Best regards, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: [email protected] PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 _______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
