Folks,

In Sections 5.1.1.1 and 5.1.1.2, you say, "Only prefixes with value "False" in 
column "Global" MUST be discarded on Internet BGP peerings."



This statement is mostly true, but I can think of a corner case. Assume that 
two autonomous systems are cooperating to provide a DS-lite or some similar 
service. They might agree to co-ordinate assignment of non-global routes and 
exchange non-global routes with one another.



                                                                                
  Ron


From: Ronald Bonica
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 9:34 AM
To: 'Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve)'; opsec wg mailing list
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Start of 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-bgp-security

Folks,

This document is very comprehensive and well-written. Kudos to the authors.

However, please take a look at the Forward.

                                                Ron


From: OPSEC [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Gunter Van de Velde 
(gvandeve)
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 7:56 AM
To: opsec wg mailing list
Cc: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>;
 [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] Start of 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-bgp-security

Please find this reminder to query for your feedback.

Brgds,
G/

From: Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve)
Sent: 08 April 2014 11:18
To: opsec wg mailing list
Cc: KK ([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>); 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Start of 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-bgp-security


Dear OpSec WG,


This starts a 2nd Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-opsec-bgp-security.

Due to the time taken to integrate all comments from the first WGLC this 2nd 
WGLC is initiated.



All three authors have replied, stating that they do not know of any IPR 
associated with this draft.


The draft is available here: 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsec-bgp-security/<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only/>


Please review this draft to see if you think it is ready for publication and 
comments to the list, clearly stating your view.


This WGLC ends 22-April-2014.


Thanks,

G/

_______________________________________________
OPSEC mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec

Reply via email to