Hi, Mike, On 07/16/2014 04:13 PM, C. M. Heard wrote: > OK, or even desirable, to block things like that. In fairness to Mr. Gont, > this > draft is MUCH better that the initial versions of the corresponding IPv4 > options > filtering document.
Thanks. And it's an individual -00 version. Nothing is set on stone. Even it I don't agree with all of them, the filtering > recommendations in this draft do seem to motivated by legitimate operational > concerns, not blanket paranoia. > > I think we should move further discussion back to OPSEC and V6OPS. Agree. Thanks! -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: [email protected] PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 _______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
