On 7/23/14, 6:42 PM, Michael Behringer (mbehring) wrote: > OPsec WG, > > Joel has requested us to add a paragraph to the intro of this draft, > expressing the concern of several folks discussed on the list. This is the > only change from -08 to -09, and the paragraph in question reads: > > During IESG review the technical correctness and completeness of the > document has been fully reviewed and verified, However, IESG noted > that there was no full consensus within the working group on whether > to recommend this technique.
Sorry, I'm going to have to apologize becasue reading this again while not under the duress of the meeting I think it misses the point (it's not the IESG) and we need to tweak one last time. During WG and IETF last call the technical correctness of the document has been reviewed, however debate exists as to whether to recommend this technique. The deployment of this technique is appropriate where it is found to be necessary. > With this, we believe that all outstanding issues are resolved. > > Michael > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: 23 July 2014 18:37 >> To: [email protected]; [email protected]; >> [email protected] >> Subject: New Version Notification - draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only-09.txt >> >> >> A new version (-09) has been submitted for draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only: >> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only-09.txt >> >> >> The IETF datatracker page for this Internet-Draft is: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only/ >> >> Diff from previous version: >> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only-09 >> >> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of >> submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at >> tools.ietf.org. >> >> IETF Secretariat. > >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
