On 8/19/2014 3:29 PM, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Fernando Gont <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: I must say that I fail to see the need for generating IPv6 atomic fragments 8packets with a frag header, which are not really fragmented). See e.g. what we wrote in <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gont-6man-deprecate-atomfrag-generation-00>. It does seem kind of silly that we say "you must support MTU >= 1280 to run IPv6" and then allow PTB packets with an MTU < 1280. Any reason we can't simply say that PTB packets < 1280 are invalid?
I can't see a good reason that the INT area couldn't do this. I see many reasons why V6OPS shouldn't be deciding this.
Joe _______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
