Andreas

Thanks for the report.

There is indeed an error in RFC 7404 about the MAC expansion. I cannot
imagine how we (the authors) failed to spot it.

-éric

On 16/11/14 23:09, "RFC Errata System" <[email protected]> wrote:

>The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7404,
>"Using Only Link-Local Addressing inside an IPv6 Network".
>
>--------------------------------------
>You may review the report below and at:
>http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7404&eid=4183
>
>--------------------------------------
>Type: Technical
>Reported by: Andreas Cudok <[email protected]>
>
>Section: 2.3
>
>Original Text
>-------------
>Hardware dependency: LLAs have usually been based on 64-bit Extended
>Unique Identifiers (EUI-64); hence, they change when the Message
>Authentication Code (MAC) address is changed.
>
>Corrected Text
>--------------
>Hardware dependency: LLAs have usually been based on 64-bit Extended
>Unique Identifiers (EUI-64); hence, they change when the Media
>Access Control (MAC) address is changed.
>
>Notes
>-----
>
>
>Instructions:
>-------------
>This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
>use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
>rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
>can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
>--------------------------------------
>RFC7404 (draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only-11)
>--------------------------------------
>Title               : Using Only Link-Local Addressing inside an IPv6
>Network
>Publication Date    : November 2014
>Author(s)           : M. Behringer, E. Vyncke
>Category            : INFORMATIONAL
>Source              : Operational Security Capabilities for IP Network
>Infrastructure
>Area                : Operations and Management
>Stream              : IETF
>Verifying Party     : IESG
>

_______________________________________________
OPSEC mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec

Reply via email to