As an author on one the the docs that motivated this work I am interested in when and how ND implementations go kaboom.
On 3/12/15 8:53 AM, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) wrote: > Cross-posting to opsec, > Al > bmwg co-chair > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: bmwg [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of MORTON, ALFRED C >> (AL) >> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 1:55 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [bmwg] WG ADOPTION: draft-cerveny-bmwg-ipv6-nd- >> >> >> REMINDER: >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: bmwg [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of MORTON, ALFRED C >>> (AL) >>> Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 3:20 PM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: [bmwg] WG ADOPTION: draft-cerveny-bmwg-ipv6-nd- >>> >>> >>> BMWG, >>> >>> We've been discussing a draft for Benchmarking Neighbor Discovery >>> for some time. >>> >>> Our new charter includes IPv6ND, so we ask >>> everyone to take a look (by March 18th) >>> and express comments/support. >>> >>> The latest draft is here: >>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cerveny-bmwg-ipv6-nd-06 >>> >>> regards, >>> Al >>> bmwg co-chair >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> bmwg mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg >> >> _______________________________________________ >> bmwg mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg > > _______________________________________________ > bmwg mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
