I'm wondering if perhaps some parts of this udp-advisory document would be 
better served integrated into this document: 
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis-05

Thanks,

Wes


From: OPSEC <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf 
of Ca By <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Monday, July 20, 2015 at 8:46 PM
To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: 
"[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>"
 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: [OPSEC] draft-byrne-opsec-udp-advisory

Op sec,

Given the number of udp related developments, I created this I-d to express 
concern  about further udp work and expound on some operational practices that 
conflict with udp growth.

Your feedback is welcome.

=========

A new version of I-D, draft-byrne-opsec-udp-advisory-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Cameron Byrne and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:        draft-byrne-opsec-udp-advisory
Revision:    00
Title:        Advisory Guidelines for UDP Deployment
Document date:    2015-07-20
Group:        Individual Submission
Pages:        5
URL:            
https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-byrne-opsec-udp-advisory-00.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-byrne-opsec-udp-advisory/
Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-byrne-opsec-udp-advisory-00


Abstract:
  User Datagram Protocol (UDP) is commonly used as a volumetric attack
  transport on the internet.  Some network operators experience surges
  of UDP attack traffic that are multiple orders of magnitude above the
  baseline traffic rate for UDP.  Application developers should be
  advised that UDP is being rate-limited on a bits-per-second and
  packet-per-second basis by network operators to enforce known good
  baseline traffic levels for UDP. UDP has been abused to such an
  extent that legitimate use may become collateral damage and
  application and protocol developers should avoid using UDP as a
  transport when possible.





Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at 
tools.ietf.org<http://tools.ietf.org/>.

The IETF Secretariat

________________________________
This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable 
proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to 
copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for 
the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any 
dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the 
contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be 
unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender 
immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and 
any printout.
_______________________________________________
OPSEC mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec

Reply via email to