Hi, Alissa, On 08/20/2015 12:21 AM, Alissa Cooper wrote: >>> I think the tables in 3.1.5 would be a lot more useful if the >>> table captions noted the total number of addresses investigated >>> (N). >> >> Not sure what you mean. Isn't it more meaningful to talk about >> percentages rather than number of addresses? >> > > I meant the total number of addresses. Like, 6% of 100 hosts > investigated doesn’t mean much but 6% of a million hosts might. I > assume these totals are in the papers but it would be easier to > include them directly in the document. Or maybe I misunderstood what > the table data represents?
All percentages are statistically significative... the measurements were performed based on ALexa's top 1M sites.... Thanks! Best regards, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: [email protected] PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 _______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
