Relaying message to WGLC discussion alias G/
From: v6ops <[email protected]> on behalf of Erik Kline <[email protected]> Date: Tuesday, 18 April 2017 at 09:30 To: Gunter Van De Velde <[email protected]> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, 6man <[email protected]> Subject: [ALU] Re: [v6ops] Fwd: [OPSEC] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6 2.1.2. Use of ULAs Still? Really? On 18 April 2017 at 16:18, Gunter Van De Velde <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Dear 6man, v6ops, Due to the IPv6 focus of "draft-ietf-opsec-v6" the OPSEC WGLC for this document may be of interest to both 6man as v6ops. Please send your feedback to OPSEC email list, where discussion around this document should take place. Kind Regards, G/ Begin forwarded message: From: Gunter Van De Velde <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: [OPSEC] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6 Date: 12 April 2017 at 09:39:28 GMT+2 To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> This is to open a two week WGLC for https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsec-v6. If you have not read it, please do so now. You may send nits to the author, but substantive discussion should go to the list. I will close the call on 26 April 2017 G/ Sent from iCloud _______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec _______________________________________________ v6ops mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
SMIME Cryptographic Signature.p7s
Description: SMIME Cryptographic Signature.p7s
_______________________________________________ v6ops mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
_______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
