At this time I want to encourage a thorough review and list any comments. With all the comments received so far I want to consolidate them all and address all the points with co-authors, then bring to list to ensure that there’s wg concensus on what changes are necessary.
So a fresh review soon would be welcome. - merike > On May 6, 2017, at 6:48 AM, Fernando Gont <[email protected]> wrote: > > Folks, > > I did a thorough review of at least half of the document a while a go. If you > need further reviews, I volunteer for that. > > Since I haven't looked at the I-F for a while, it would count as a "fresh > review", I guess. > > Thanks! > Cheers, > Fernando > > > > > > El 6/5/2017 03:56, "Merike Kaeo" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> escribió: > Just as Ack re capturing all the comments and discusisons and working with > other co-authors to resolve. > > If anyone is at RIPE meeting and would like to discuss, let me know. > > - merike > >> On May 4, 2017, at 11:39 PM, Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Hi Authors from draft-ietf-opsec-v6 and OPSEC WG, >> >> There has been significant discussion during WGLC for this document and >> during the process indications that group consensus is on some topics is not >> reached yet. >> Last message from Merike indicates that draft authors will work on capturing >> all comments and resolve them with ‘group consensus’. >> >> I’ll be waiting for an updated document and check with authors and WG when >> time is ready for a fresh WGLC. >> >> G/ >> >> From: OPSEC <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> on >> behalf of Gunter Van De Velde <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> >> Date: Wednesday, 12 April 2017 at 09:39 >> To: "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> >> Subject: [ALU] [OPSEC] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6 >> >> This is to open a two week WGLC for >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsec-v6 >> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsec-v6>. >> If you have not read it, please do so now. You may send nits to the author, >> but substantive discussion should go to the list. >> >> >> I will close the call on 26 April 2017 >> >> >> G/ >> Sent from iCloud >> _______________________________________________ >> OPSEC mailing list >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec >> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec> > > > _______________________________________________ > OPSEC mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec> >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
