On 11/28/2017 12:43 PM, Michael Richardson wrote: > > C. M. Heard <[email protected]> wrote: > > It seems to me that the option description and filtering advice given > > in > > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-eh-filtering-04#section-4.3.4 > > a) it only coverts 0x63, and we are changing to 0x23. > b) yes, the advice to drop is not good. > > I'm unclear from a quick read if this the black-list advice, or the > white-list advice.
This is meant to be black-list advice. The current advice in our document is to drop packets with this option at non-RPL routers. Isn't this advice aligned with the fact that the option type bits note that nodes that do not support this option should drop the corresponding packets? Thanks! Cheers, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: [email protected] PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 _______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
