Hi Jean,

>FYI, as mentioned during opsec WG session, there was a presentation, during 
>grow WG session, about an alternative solution

The draft in consideration (sriram-opsec-urpf-improvements) has received 
extensive comments 
in OPSEC and GROW WGs since November 2016. 
We have carefully revised the draft (in versions -02 and -03) based on comments 
from the two WGs.
So we are open and enthusiastic about WG inputs and feedback.

We (the authors on this draft) are familiar with Alexander's recent uRPF 
proposal and open to talking to him.
We’ll be open to WG suggestions on such matters as our work continues to 
progress.
(BTW, there was also a proposal in RTGWG meeting at IETF 101 by Igor Lubashev 
(Akamai).) 

Thank you for your interest and comment.

Sriram  
  

_______________________________________________
OPSEC mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec

Reply via email to