Folks,
Any comments, positive, negative or indifferent would be appreciated. It is
difficult to judge consensus in the face of silence.
Ron
From: OPSEC <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2018 8:03 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: [OPSEC] Reminder: Call for WG adoption of
draft-sriram-opsec-urpf-improvements
Still two days to state whether you want this I-D adopted by our OPSEC WG
-éric & -ron
From: OPSEC <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf
of Eric Vyncke <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Wednesday 4 April 2018 at 12:15
To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>"
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc:
"[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>"
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: [OPSEC] Call for WG adoption of draft-sriram-opsec-urpf-improvements
As discussed during the WG meeting in London IETF-101, let's have a call for
adopting draft-sriram-opsec-urpf-improvements as an OPSEC Working Group
document.
The call will last 2 weeks until 18th of April included (UTC midnight).
So, please reply to the list whether you support the adoption or not.
Obviously, if adopted, then the document will probably be reviewed more
extensively and modified.
Thank you for your participation
-éric & -ron
_______________________________________________
OPSEC mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
