Equally worrisome that this doc appears to make recommendations that imply BCP, when it is merely informational.
IMO, it’s overstepping to do so. Joe > On Nov 23, 2018, at 11:53 AM, Michael Scharf <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Reviewer: Michael Scharf > Review result: Ready > > This document has been reviewed as part of the transport area review team's > ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written > primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the document's > authors and WG to allow them to address any issues raised and also to the IETF > discussion list for information. > > When done at the time of IETF Last Call, the authors should consider this > review as part of the last-call comments they receive. Please > always CC [email protected] if you reply to or forward this review. > > I have reviewed draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-eh-filtering-06. There are no apparent > transport issues. The proposed filtering could slow down the deployment of > experimental protocols that use IPv6 options, but the tradeoffs are explained > in the document. > > Thanks > > Michael > _______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
