I do subscribe, so this note may accomplish the goal. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dhc-sedhcpv6/ says that [I-D.ietf-dhc-sedhcpv6] is "dead" from the IESG's perspective. They have asked for a revised draft, over two years ago, and none has been posted.
> On Apr 9, 2019, at 10:48 AM, 神明達哉 <[email protected]> wrote: > > (Note: I don't subscribe to [email protected]. So I expect this message > will be subject to moderation). > > At Fri, 29 Mar 2019 06:18:37 +0100, > Fred Baker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Yesterday, the authors of an opec draft asked us for comments on their > > draft, which is in a second WGLC in opec ([email protected]). You may have > > missed the character string: > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsec-v6 > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsec-v6 > > "Operational Security Considerations for IPv6 Networks", Eric Vyncke, > > Chittimaneni Kk, Merike Kaeo, Enno Rey, 2019-03-11, > > > > I'd encourage people to read it and comment on the opec list. > > One quick comment, in case no one pointed it out: Section 2.3.3 refers > to I-D.ietf-dhc-sedhcpv6 as follows: > > [...] Another way to secure > DHCPv6 would be to use the secure DHCPv6 protocol which is currently > work in progress per [I-D.ietf-dhc-sedhcpv6] , but, with no real > deployment known by the authors of this document. > > In my understanding, this draft is effectively dead rather than just > missing deployment. There may be yet another attempt of restarting it > in future, but I see no indication of it right now. Even if the work > is eventually restarted it will be something completely different from > the current latest draft. So I'd suggest either: > - just remove this sentence, or > - if you want to keep the reference, make it more consistent with the > current situation, like: > There was a proposal of secure DHCPv6 protocol [I-D.ietf-dhc-sedhcpv6], > but the work has been effectively suspended and there is no > indication of a restart anytime soon. > > -- > JINMEI, Tatuya -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The fact that there is a highway to hell and a stairway to heaven is an interesting comment on projected traffic volume...
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
