Jen, Ron, As co-author of the document, the latest -17 revision dated 2019-07-05 addresses (at least from the authors point of view): - the comments received during the WG meeting at IETF-104 - the OPSDIR review by Tim Chown dated 2018-07-02 - the WGLC ended in 2017-09-29
The state of the document in the datatracker is still "Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by WGLC" since 2017-09-29 though. As I was co-chair at that point of time, I should have reset the state to a more suitable one... Would you mind resetting the state to a more suitable one? Note: I have requested a slot to present this work at V6OPS https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/105/materials/agenda-105-v6ops-03 With all the reviews and the updates, may I kindly suggest, if the WG chairs and members agree, to request publication? Happy to talk to you in Montreal of course. Thank you for considering this request, -éric On 06/07/2019, 18:43, "OPSEC on behalf of Enno Rey" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: Dear WG Chairs, All, we've considered & mostly incorporated the input from the mailing list (thanks for the latest reviews and comments!) and from the IETF104 session, and we'd hence like to ask for WGLC of the document. thanks Enno -- Enno Rey ERNW GmbH - Carl-Bosch-Str. 4 - 69115 Heidelberg - www.ernw.de Tel. +49 6221 480390 - Fax 6221 419008 - Cell +49 173 6745902 Handelsregister Mannheim: HRB 337135 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Florian Grunow, Michael Schaefer ======================================================= Blog: www.insinuator.net || Conference: www.troopers.de Twitter: @Enno_Insinuator ======================================================= _______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec _______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
