Eric, I support Brian’s proposed changes.
Bob > On Sep 22, 2019, at 5:05 AM, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <[email protected]> wrote: > > Brian, > > Thank you for the improved text. > > Expect a -19 any time soon > > -éric > > On 21/09/2019, 23:14, "OPSEC on behalf of Brian E Carpenter" > <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I think the ULA section is still not quite right. > >> 2.1.1. Use of ULAs >> >> Unique Local Addresses (ULAs) [RFC4193] are intended for scenarios >> where systems are not globally reachable, despite formally having >> global scope. ULA are not similar to [RFC1918] addresses and have >> different use cases. One use of ULA is described in [RFC4864] and >> some considerations on using ULA is described in the draft document >> [I-D.ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-considerations]; this document failed to >> have the IETF consensus and is now considered as dead. > > 1. I think it is worth mentioning that ULAs should be filtered at domain > boundaries. > > 2. Actually they are *similar* to RFC1918 - but they are not the same. > > 3. I don't think there is any use in referencing a draft that you describe > as "dead". > > So, a possible rewrite: > > 2.1.1. Use of ULAs > > Unique Local Addresses (ULAs) [RFC4193] are intended for scenarios > where interfaces are not globally reachable, despite being routed > within a domain. They formally have global scope, but RFC 4193 > sepcifies that they must be filtered out at domain boundaries. > ULAs are different from [RFC1918] addresses and have different use > cases. One use case is described in [RFC4864]. > > Regards > Brian Carpenter > > _______________________________________________ > OPSEC mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec > > > _______________________________________________ > OPSEC mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
