Agreed. We will update the draft to reflect. This is exactly what I have been looking for in an enterprise setting and I see it’s authored by ISC.
Thank you for enlightening me. Gyan On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 4:53 AM Ted Lemon <[email protected]> wrote: > On Nov 19, 2019, at 8:12 PM, Gyan Mishra <[email protected]> wrote: > > See RFC 6853. > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6853#section-6.1 > > With DHCPV6 all servers are active and that is why there is not any state > sharing since the pool has to be different and there a a preference option > as to which server is preferred. This does go deeper into host > configuration which is out of scope for this document so will leave out. > > > Right. What I’m suggesting is that you explicitly recommend using DHCPv6 > servers that support RFC 8156 rather than the less effective solution > proposed in RFC 6853. This recommendation will not be actionable for all > network operators, but it should work well in enterprise settings. > > -- Gyan S. Mishra IT Network Engineering & Technology Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) 13101 Columbia Pike FDC1 3rd Floor Silver Spring, MD 20904 United States Phone: 301 502-1347 Email: [email protected] www.linkedin.com/in/networking-technologies-consultant
_______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
