Hello Erik Thank you again for the review. We have accepted all your nits except those below (see EV>). They will appear in revision -22
Regards -éric (the other one) On 02/12/2019, 17:24, "Erik Kline via Datatracker" <[email protected]> wrote: - It's not clear if RFC 2119 text is needed for this document as it is now. EV> it does IMHO as we have some cut&paste of text from RFC having those words. - 2.1.5 - Could perhaps more explicitly state that DHCPv6 is not mandatory to implement per IPv6 Node Requirements (RFC 8504). EV> I would prefer not to mention it in the sake of brevity. DHCPv4 is also not mandated for IPv4. - 2.4.2 - With the mention of NTP I suddenly thought: should there be DNS-related text as well, or does that fall within this section too? EV> as we mention protocols used by the routers, I would say that DNS is not really required & relied upon by routers (albeit often use), I would assume that DNS is simply included in the '...' - 2.5.3 - The CYMRU link doesn't seem to go to a useful page anymore. :-/ EV> indeed, it looks like CYMRU has become a commercial company :-( unable to find the previous document :-( removed all links _______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
