Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsec-v6-25: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsec-v6/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I haven't gone through the dozens of references to verify the claims about them, so I'm trusting the WG and ADs here... In Sec 2.3.2.4, RA-Guard and SAVI are recommended, but then in the same paragraph it says that "only trivial cases" should enable it by default. I can't reconcile these two statements. _______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
