As I mumbled at the mic, I think that this is a useful document. It's certainly not a perfect mechanism, but I still believe that it is worth adopting.
W (No hats) On Tue, Aug 2 2022 at 7:21 AM, Gert Doering <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 07:37:08PM -0400, Jen Linkova wrote: > > This email starts the adoption call for > draft-vyncke-opsec-probe-attribution > (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vyncke-opsec-probe-attribution/) > > The adoption call ends on Aug 14th, 23:59 UTC. > > Please read the draft and respond to this thread. stating your position > re: adoption. > > I think this is a useful document, so: support adoption. > > I had to smile at the sentence "it is expected that only good-willing > researchers will use these techniques" - maybe require use of RFC3514? > (seriously: section 6 already contains clear verbiage on "you can not > trust this"). > > Gert Doering > -- NetMaster > -- > have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? > > SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer > Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 > Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) > > _______________________________________________ > OPSEC mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec >
_______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
