Thanks Jen. We do have plans to address Chris's comments (and thanks to Chris for the feedback). We're working on a new version which we hope to have ready soon.
Thanks, Andrew -----Original Message----- From: Jen Linkova <[email protected]> Sent: 02 September 2022 11:34 To: opsec WG <[email protected]> Cc: OpSec Chairs <[email protected]>; [email protected] Subject: Re: WGLC: draft-ietf-opsec-indicators-of-compromise The WG Last Call has finished. The chairs believe the group in favour of advancing the document. The authors - do you have plans to address Chris's comments? Shall we expect the new revision? On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 1:32 AM Jen Linkova <[email protected]> wrote: > > This email starts a WG Last Call for > draft-ietf-opsec-indicators-of-compromise > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsec-indicators-of-compromise/ > > The WGLC finishes on Sunday, Aug 14th, 25:59 UTC. > > The chairs are looking for people who would review the document and > respond to the list stating their support (or concerns regarding) > advancing the draft. > > Thank you! > -- > SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry -- SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry This information is exempt under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) and may be exempt under other UK information legislation. Refer any FOIA queries to [email protected]. All material is UK Crown Copyright (c) _______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
